|
|
Post by Charley Says... on Jan 5, 2017 0:14:01 GMT
Does anyone else think that was rape...?
Come on guys... She'd had her hair done... That's a sign isn't it...?
But she was giving him the come on... And she rejected his proposal... Maybe it was his masculine right...?
She did humiliate him... In front of friends... That probably gives him the right...?
Did she say NO...? Did she mean it...? Did she want it...?
It might not be comfortable but who was right and who was wrong...??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts Made: 0
Likes Received:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2017 5:48:26 GMT
It was rape, no doubt about it. Rhona did not give her consent. When Pi$$ was feeling amorous, Rhona said not now, maybe later. But Pi$$ wouldn`t take no for an answer. He wanted to humiliate her like she unintentionally humiliated him when she turned down his grand gesture marriage proposal.
This storyline is every bit as sinister as I thought it would be. Pi$$ takes great delight in making himself out to be a victim, and making Rhona second guess herself. But now he`s gone too far. With him being a slick lawyer he may talk Rhona into believing it was her fault. That`s probably what went wrong in he and Tess`s marriage. It wouldn`t surprise me in the least.
I hope Pi$$ leaves the village in a pine coffin minus his scrotum. He deserves nothing less.
|
|
|
|
Post by butterball on Jan 5, 2017 8:16:35 GMT
Yes Peers is sinister but the big problem with this story is that we all know where it is going, Rhona to get back with that big fat red faced bumbling cheating fool despite her constant entrieties that its "definitely over" between them. Just like Lisa, total U turn, no wonder some men think No could mean Yes.  |
|
|
|
Post by CAEF on Jan 5, 2017 12:50:59 GMT
Maybe Leaser should be raped again so it will redeem Zak.
|
|
