|
|
Post by wallis on Jul 28, 2016 21:38:25 GMT
Oh me too Lotty...... They wouldn't know a good thing if it kicked them in the face. hit-smileys Quality actors both of them given the right material. Going off SOC even before he makes his mark on EE. |
|
|
|
Post by Lotty27 on Jul 28, 2016 21:51:45 GMT
I just don't get the decision wallis. They've proved they can be centre stage and maintain people's interest but most importantly they are bloody good actors, some of the best on the show IMO. The usual excuse is being made of them having run their course but, aside from the fact that they themselves boxed them in like this killing off Paul, it shows a big lack of imagination from TPTB IMO.
Yet Shakil who can't act to save his topknot is still stinking up the square free-rolleye-smileys-323
|
|
|
|
Post by wallis on Jul 28, 2016 22:05:43 GMT
I just don't get the decision wallis. They've proved they can be centre stage and maintain people's interest but most importantly they are bloody good actors, some of the best on the show IMO. The usual excuse is being made of them having run their course but, aside from the fact that they themselves boxed them in like this killing off Paul, it shows a big lack of imagination from TPTB IMO. Yet Shakil who can't act to save his topknot is still stinking up the square free-rolleye-smileys-323 I reckon they knew they weren't getting their contracts renewed when they went on holiday to Greece with Jonny Labey to celebrate Roger's 70th birthday. They seem so close off screen. Run their course....... We could say that about a lot of the characters such as Ronnie but they continue to get their wages each week, shocking!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by kitkat1971 on Jul 28, 2016 23:11:03 GMT
A mistake in my opinion.
Okay, they're not huge dominating characters so I can't see them being written out being brought up in years or decades to come like some characters (cough Pat, Cindy cough) as something that should never have happened, but I do think there was a place for them in the show as generally 'supporting' characters who get to shine in their own storylines once in a while.
Yes, they've boxed them in by killing Paul off but even with that, there was potential. What about Pam's background in Social Services? The relationship with Billy and his kids? They could have developed a bond with Ben and all that would mean with the Mitchell's.
I hope it isn't an indication that SOC is only interested in pretty, sexy young things.
|
|
|
|
Post by CAEF on Aug 1, 2016 20:39:20 GMT
Getting rid of 3 gooduns, Les, Pam and Buster. And what, keeping the walking STD's like Whitless and Ronnie on??
|
|
|
|
Post by Holey on Aug 13, 2016 23:19:43 GMT
Sam Womack (Ronnie) to leave EastEnders next year.  |
|
|
|
Post by wallis on Aug 13, 2016 23:31:46 GMT
Sam Womack (Ronnie) to leave EastEnders next year. GOOD! Best news I've heard all year. She is past her sell by date by far. |
|
|
|
Post by Holey on Aug 13, 2016 23:34:26 GMT
duplicate post
|
|
|
|
Post by Holey on Aug 13, 2016 23:36:02 GMT
Sam Womack (Ronnie) to leave EastEnders next year. GOOD! Best news I've heard all year. She is past her sell by date by far. fighting-230 |
|
|
|
Post by J-B on Aug 14, 2016 0:16:19 GMT
I'm glad Ronnie is going. She spent most of her adult life acquiring babies through a diverse range of means, then when she finally gets one turns into the biggest bore on the square.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lotty27 on Aug 14, 2016 4:16:58 GMT
Thank Gawd for that. Now if they can make sure she had a bonnet banged off her head and is then chucked in the boot, left there for a day or so while some raving loony comes and yells at the car and is then sent to the crusher I'll be a happy bunny.
|
|
|
|
Post by wallis on Aug 14, 2016 17:21:08 GMT
Can someone explain to me how Samantha Womack has quit EE when in reality SOC has offered her a-too-good-to-refuse exit storyline? A spokesman for the BBC said 'it is time to rest the character'. Sounds like an axing with benefits to me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Holey on Aug 14, 2016 17:32:12 GMT
Can someone explain to me how Samantha Womack has quit EE when in reality SOC has offered her a-too-good-to-refuse exit storyline? A spokesman for the BBC said 'it is time to rest the character'. Sounds like an axing with benefits to me. I am not sure she has quit as such, I don't think Sam has made an official statement yet, but reading between the lines I think SOC had decided the character had run its course and Sam liked the sound of her exit storyline. Sam will leave on good terms I am sure, I doubt she will be short of offers, when she left the show after the baby swap storyline she did a West End Musical, a couple of dramas and a series or two of mount pleasant. I think like Jo Joyner Sam will find roles. She was famous before coming into the Square under her maiden name Janus. |
|
|
|
Post by Mo Mouse on Aug 14, 2016 19:46:57 GMT
Ronnie is a mentally disturbed child kidnapper and I'll be glad when she's gone. It's our children that I fear for. And our children's children. One less psychopath means that we can all sleep safely in our beds. Thanks guys. God bless. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by wallis on Aug 18, 2016 21:56:39 GMT
Rita Simons is leaving EE along with Samantha Womak!
|
|
